Skip to main content

Satellite operator OQ Technology joins direct

Covering the business and politics of space
TAMPA, Fla. — Europe has given Luxembourg’s OQ Technology a contract to study ways to connect unmodified smartphones from its low Earth orbit constellation, which currently provides narrowband connectivity for remote Internet of Things (IoT) devices.
Luxembourg’s government is providing an undisclosed amount of funding for the six-month feasibility contract, OQ Technology CEO Omar Qaise said Feb. 7. Such contracts are typically below $1 million in value.
The project officially kicked off Jan. 24 and will study upgrades the company’s payload and software would need to reach phones already out in the market.
“We should lay down the plan for a following in-orbit demonstration mission,” Qaise told SpaceNews via email.
The eight 6U cubesats OQ Technology already has in low Earth orbit — plus another two slated to launch on a Falcon 9 rideshare mission in March — can connect directly to off-the-shelf IoT devices and machines for tracking and monitoring services.
However, reaching standard smartphones requires more satellite power, in addition to managing the Doppler effect, which becomes more of an issue for services moving beyond messages to include images and voice.
Existing OQ Technology satellites can use all the standard narrowband spectrum bands assigned to space-based networks, according to Qaise, and one of the areas up for study is the use of radio frequencies from a terrestrial mobile network operator partner.
Using spectrum from terrestrial partners is key to plans underway by SpaceX, Lynk Global, and AST SpaceMobile to provide direct-to-smartphone services. 
Depending on the outcome of the feasibility study and OQ Technology’s ability to raise funds for the upgrades, Qaise said he anticipates deploying a satellite or a hosted payload with a direct-to-smartphone capability within two years.
“We also want to observe the other players and validate the market and technology approaches,” he added.
He said developing a capability to connect directly to phones was always part of OQ Technology’s long-term strategy, although the IoT market remains its main priority.
“Other satellite companies went directly to the broadband and direct to mobile route which requires heavy investment,” Qaise said, “our long term strategy has been always to start with 
IoT, build the knowledge and network and then progress to the next steps of direct to mobile phone.”
Terrestrial partnerships come with risks
Teaming up with mobile network partners could quickly give a satellite operator a critical mass of subscribers to fund the service, direct-to-smartphone executives said during the SmallSat Symposium Feb. 7 in Mountain View, California.
Getting access to millions of customers already subscribed to a mobile network is important because direct-to-smartphone operators are looking at just $1 average revenue per user (ARPU) in some of the world’s poorest regions, said Jaume Sanpera, CEO and founder of Spain’s Sateliot. 
Sateliot plans to deploy its first commercial satellites this year for an IoT network that, similar to OQ Technology, would also be upgraded later for direct-to-smartphone services.
According to Skylo, which has developed technology enabling phones to connect with geostationary satellites using radio waves already assigned to space-based operators, beaming terrestrial frequencies from orbit creates significant interference risk.
“I think it’s a very risky thing to be using large volumes of devices for a purpose which they were not necessarily meant to be used originally,” said Andrew Nuttall, Skylo Technologies cofounder and chief technology officer.
Exclusion zones could help manage interference risk, but would limit the appeal for potential direct-to-smartphone users.
Although Lynk Global is providing early services with local mobile operator partners in parts of more than seven countries, the satellite operator has yet to book revenues.
Lynk Global, SpaceX, and AST SpaceMobile are eagerly waiting for a regulatory framework from the Federal Communications Commission that would pave the way for direct-to-device clearances in the United States, and guide other administrations.
The stakes are high for the shape of the emerging market, said Mindel De La Torre, chief regulatory and international strategy officer for Omnispace, which hopes to use its S-band satellite spectrum to help mobile operators plug gaps in their terrestrial networks.
She said SpaceX’s plans to use terrestrial spectrum from T-Mobile for a direct-to-smartphone service would derail Omnispace’s plans in the United States.
“If they’re allowed to do what they’re trying to do, we will be suffering interference tens of thousands of [kilometers] away,” she said.
SpaceX was recently granted a temporary license from the Federal Communications Commission to its test direct-to-smartphone in the United States and study the potential for interference.
Jason Rainbow writes about satellite telecom, space finance and commercial markets for SpaceNews. He has spent more than a decade covering the global space industry as a business journalist. Previously, he was Group Editor-in-Chief for Finance Information…
all events >>
Get top stories, military space news and more delivered to your inbox.

sourceSatellite indiaSatellite chinaSatellite usaSatellite
Canada
Satellite kuwaitSatellite Antigua and Barbuda
Satellite ArgentinaSatellite Armenia
Satellite
Australia
Satellite Austria
Satellite Austrian Empire*
Azerbaijan
Satellite Baden*
Bahamas, The
Satellite Bahrain
Satellite Bangladesh
Satellite Barbados
Satellite Bavaria*
Satellite Belarus
Satellite Belgium
Satellite Belize
Satellite Benin (Dahomey)
Satellite Bolivia
Satellite Bosnia and Herzegovina
Satellite Botswana
Satellite Brazil
Satellite Brunei
Satellite Brunswick and Lüneburg*
Satellite Bulgaria
Satellite Burkina Faso
Satellite Burma
Satellite Burundi
Satellite Cabo Verde
Satellite Cambodia
Satellite Cameroon
Satellite Canada
Satellite Cayman Islands, The
Satellite Central African Republic
Satellite Central American Federation*
Satellite Chad
Satellite Chile
Satellite China
China
Satellite Colombia
Satellite Comoros
Satellite Congo Free State, The*
Satellite Costa Rica
Satellite Cote d’Ivoire
Satellite Croatia
Satellite Cuba
Satellite Cyprus
Satellite Czechia
Satellite Czechoslovakia*
Satellite Democratic Republic of the Congo
Satellite Denmark
Satellite Djibouti
Satellite Dominica
Satellite Dominican Republic
Satellite Duchy of Parma, The*
Satellite East Germany German Democratic Republic*
Satellite Ecuador
Satellite Egypt
Satellite El Salvador
Satellite Equatorial Guinea
Satellite Eritrea
Satellite Estonia
Satellite Eswatini
Satellite Ethiopia
Satellite Federal Government of Germany *
Satellite Fiji
Satellite Finland
Satellite indiaSatellite chinaSatellite usaSatellite
Canada
Satellite kuwaitSatellite Antigua and Barbuda
Satellite ArgentinaSatellite Armenia
Satellite
Australia
Satellite Austria
Satellite Austrian Empire*
Azerbaijan
Satellite Baden*
Bahamas, The
Satellite Bahrain
Satellite Bangladesh
Satellite Barbados
Satellite Bavaria*
Satellite Belarus
Satellite Belgium
Satellite Belize
Satellite Benin (Dahomey)
Satellite Bolivia
Satellite Bosnia and Herzegovina
Satellite Botswana
Satellite Brazil
Satellite Brunei
Satellite Brunswick and Lüneburg*
Satellite Bulgaria
Satellite Burkina Faso (Upper Volta)
Satellite Burma
Satellite Burundi
Satellite Cabo Verde
Satellite Cambodia
Satellite Cameroon
Satellite Canada
Satellite Cayman Islands, The
Satellite Central African Republic
Satellite Central American Federation*
Satellite Chad
Satellite Chile
Satellite China
China
Satellite Colombia
Satellite Comoros
Satellite Congo Free State, The*
Satellite Costa Rica
Satellite Cote d’Ivoire
Satellite Croatia
Satellite Cuba
Satellite Cyprus
Satellite Czechia
Satellite Czechoslovakia*
Satellite Democratic Republic of the Congo
Satellite Denmark
Satellite Djibouti
Satellite Dominica
Satellite Dominican Republic
Satellite Duchy of Parma, The*
Satellite East Germany
Satellite Ecuador
Satellite Egypt
Satellite El Salvador
Satellite Equatorial Guinea
Satellite Eritrea
Satellite Estonia
Satellite Eswatini
Satellite Ethiopia
Satellite Federal Government of Germany *
Satellite Fiji
Satellite Finland
Covering the business and politics of space
TAMPA, Fla. — Europe has given Luxembourg’s OQ Technology a contract to study ways to connect unmodified smartphones from its low Earth orbit constellation, which currently provides narrowband connectivity for remote Internet of Things (IoT) devices.
Luxembourg’s government is providing an undisclosed amount of funding for the six-month feasibility contract, OQ Technology CEO Omar Qaise said Feb. 7. Such contracts are typically below $1 million in value.
The project officially kicked off Jan. 24 and will study upgrades the company’s payload and software would need to reach phones already out in the market.
“We should lay down the plan for a following in-orbit demonstration mission,” Qaise told SpaceNews via email.
The eight 6U cubesats OQ Technology already has in low Earth orbit — plus another two slated to launch on a Falcon 9 rideshare mission in March — can connect directly to off-the-shelf IoT devices and machines for tracking and monitoring services.
However, reaching standard smartphones requires more satellite power, in addition to managing the Doppler effect, which becomes more of an issue for services moving beyond messages to include images and voice.
Existing OQ Technology satellites can use all the standard narrowband spectrum bands assigned to space-based networks, according to Qaise, and one of the areas up for study is the use of radio frequencies from a terrestrial mobile network operator partner.
Using spectrum from terrestrial partners is key to plans underway by SpaceX, Lynk Global, and AST SpaceMobile to provide direct-to-smartphone services. 
Depending on the outcome of the feasibility study and OQ Technology’s ability to raise funds for the upgrades, Qaise said he anticipates deploying a satellite or a hosted payload with a direct-to-smartphone capability within two years.
“We also want to observe the other players and validate the market and technology approaches,” he added.
He said developing a capability to connect directly to phones was always part of OQ Technology’s long-term strategy, although the IoT market remains its main priority.
“Other satellite companies went directly to the broadband and direct to mobile route which requires heavy investment,” Qaise said, “our long term strategy has been always to start with 
IoT, build the knowledge and network and then progress to the next steps of direct to mobile phone.”
Terrestrial partnerships come with risks
Teaming up with mobile network partners could quickly give a satellite operator a critical mass of subscribers to fund the service, direct-to-smartphone executives said during the SmallSat Symposium Feb. 7 in Mountain View, California.
Getting access to millions of customers already subscribed to a mobile network is important because direct-to-smartphone operators are looking at just $1 average revenue per user (ARPU) in some of the world’s poorest regions, said Jaume Sanpera, CEO and founder of Spain’s Sateliot. 
Sateliot plans to deploy its first commercial satellites this year for an IoT network that, similar to OQ Technology, would also be upgraded later for direct-to-smartphone services.
According to Skylo, which has developed technology enabling phones to connect with geostationary satellites using radio waves already assigned to space-based operators, beaming terrestrial frequencies from orbit creates significant interference risk.
“I think it’s a very risky thing to be using large volumes of devices for a purpose which they were not necessarily meant to be used originally,” said Andrew Nuttall, Skylo Technologies cofounder and chief technology officer.
Exclusion zones could help manage interference risk, but would limit the appeal for potential direct-to-smartphone users.
Although Lynk Global is providing early services with local mobile operator partners in parts of more than seven countries, the satellite operator has yet to book revenues.
Lynk Global, SpaceX, and AST SpaceMobile are eagerly waiting for a regulatory framework from the Federal Communications Commission that would pave the way for direct-to-device clearances in the United States, and guide other administrations.
The stakes are high for the shape of the emerging market, said Mindel De La Torre, chief regulatory and international strategy officer for Omnispace, which hopes to use its S-band satellite spectrum to help mobile operators plug gaps in their terrestrial networks.
She said SpaceX’s plans to use terrestrial spectrum from T-Mobile for a direct-to-smartphone service would derail Omnispace’s plans in the United States.
“If they’re allowed to do what they’re trying to do, we will be suffering interference tens of thousands of [kilometers] away,” she said.
SpaceX was recently granted a temporary license from the Federal Communications Commission to its test direct-to-smartphone in the United States and study the potential for interference.
Jason Rainbow writes about satellite telecom, space finance and commercial markets for SpaceNews. He has spent more than a decade covering the global space industry as a business journalist. Previously, he was Group Editor-in-Chief for Finance Information…
all events >>
Get top stories, military space news and more delivered to your inbox.

sourceSatellite indiaSatellite chinaSatellite usaSatellite
Canada
Satellite kuwaitSatellite Antigua and Barbuda
Satellite ArgentinaSatellite Armenia
Satellite
Australia
Satellite Austria
Satellite Austrian Empire*
Azerbaijan
Satellite Baden*
Bahamas, The
Satellite Bahrain
Satellite Bangladesh
Satellite Barbados
Satellite Bavaria*
Satellite Belarus
Satellite Belgium
Satellite Belize
Satellite Benin (Dahomey)
Satellite Bolivia
Satellite Bosnia and Herzegovina
Satellite Botswana
Satellite Brazil
Satellite Brunei
Satellite Brunswick and Lüneburg*
Satellite Bulgaria
Satellite Burkina Faso
Satellite Burma
Satellite Burundi
Satellite Cabo Verde
Satellite Cambodia
Satellite Cameroon
Satellite Canada
Satellite Cayman Islands, The
Satellite Central African Republic
Satellite Central American Federation*
Satellite Chad
Satellite Chile
Satellite China
China
Satellite Colombia
Satellite Comoros
Satellite Congo Free State, The*
Satellite Costa Rica
Satellite Cote d’Ivoire
Satellite Croatia
Satellite Cuba
Satellite Cyprus
Satellite Czechia
Satellite Czechoslovakia*
Satellite Democratic Republic of the Congo
Satellite Denmark
Satellite Djibouti
Satellite Dominica
Satellite Dominican Republic
Satellite Duchy of Parma, The*
Satellite East Germany German Democratic Republic*
Satellite Ecuador
Satellite Egypt
Satellite El Salvador
Satellite Equatorial Guinea
Satellite Eritrea
Satellite Estonia
Satellite Eswatini
Satellite Ethiopia
Satellite Federal Government of Germany *
Satellite Fiji
Satellite Finland
Satellite indiaSatellite chinaSatellite usaSatellite
Canada
Satellite kuwaitSatellite Antigua and Barbuda
Satellite ArgentinaSatellite Armenia
Satellite
Australia
Satellite Austria
Satellite Austrian Empire*
Azerbaijan
Satellite Baden*
Bahamas, The
Satellite Bahrain
Satellite Bangladesh
Satellite Barbados
Satellite Bavaria*
Satellite Belarus
Satellite Belgium
Satellite Belize
Satellite Benin (Dahomey)
Satellite Bolivia
Satellite Bosnia and Herzegovina
Satellite Botswana
Satellite Brazil
Satellite Brunei
Satellite Brunswick and Lüneburg*
Satellite Bulgaria
Satellite Burkina Faso (Upper Volta)
Satellite Burma
Satellite Burundi
Satellite Cabo Verde
Satellite Cambodia
Satellite Cameroon
Satellite Canada
Satellite Cayman Islands, The
Satellite Central African Republic
Satellite Central American Federation*
Satellite Chad
Satellite Chile
Satellite China
China
Satellite Colombia
Satellite Comoros
Satellite Congo Free State, The*
Satellite Costa Rica
Satellite Cote d’Ivoire
Satellite Croatia
Satellite Cuba
Satellite Cyprus
Satellite Czechia
Satellite Czechoslovakia*
Satellite Democratic Republic of the Congo
Satellite Denmark
Satellite Djibouti
Satellite Dominica
Satellite Dominican Republic
Satellite Duchy of Parma, The*
Satellite East Germany
Satellite Ecuador
Satellite Egypt
Satellite El Salvador
Satellite Equatorial Guinea
Satellite Eritrea
Satellite Estonia
Satellite Eswatini
Satellite Ethiopia
Satellite Federal Government of Germany *
Satellite Fiji
Satellite Finland

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Technology industry to combat deceptive use of AI in 2024 elections - Stories - Microsoft

February 16, 2024 | Microsoft Source MUNICH – February 16, 2024 – Today at the Munich Security Conference (MSC), leading technology companies pledged to help prevent deceptive AI content from interfering with this year’s global elections in which more than four billion people in over 40 countries will vote. The “Tech Accord to Combat Deceptive Use of AI in 2024 Elections” is a set of commitments to deploy technology countering harmful AI-generated content meant to deceive voters. Signatories pledge to work collaboratively on tools to detect and address online distribution of such AI content, drive educational campaigns, and provide transparency, among other concrete steps. It also includes a broad set of principles, including the importance of tracking the origin of deceptive election-related content and the need to raise public awareness about the problem. The accord is one important step to safeguard online communities against harmful AI content, and builds on the indiv...

Get a smartphone for Christmas? Here's why you should use the Pinpoint Weather App Versus the stock weather App - WKMG News 6 & ClickOrlando

A Cash Kart Edit site Customize New Edit Post SEOFocus keyphrase not set Howdy, admin Log OutSkip to content A Cash Kart Get a smartphone for Christmas? Here's why you should use the Pinpoint Weather App Versus the stock weather App – WKMG News 6 & ClickOrlando Jonathan Kegges, Meteorologist Published: January 2, 2024, 12:22 PM Updated: January 2, 2024, 12:27 PM Jonathan Kegges, Meteorologist ORLANDO, Fla. – Sure, it’s easy. The stock weather app already comes programmed into your phone. All you need to do is open it up and you have your forecast. But there is one major issue. [EXCLUSIVE: Become a News 6 Insider (it’s FREE) | PINIT! Share your photos] The forecast you’re viewing is driven solely on computer-model data. There is no meteorologist overseeing the information that you rely on to make your plans. Here’s the thing: Models are guidance, not gospel. Ever notice how the forecast on the stock weather app changes a lot? Models flip-flop all the time with the timing of imp...